Knowledge and attitudes regarding pain of nursing students in South Korea: A cross-sectional study

국내 간호대학생의 통증 관련 지식과 태도: 횡단적 연구

Article information

J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2025;31(4):473-483
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 November 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2025.31.4.473
강미라1)orcid_icon, 노주희2),orcid_icon, 권연주3)orcid_icon, 김경자4)orcid_icon
1) Advanced Practice Nurse, Asan Medical Center
1) 서울아산병원, 전문간호사
2) Professor, College of Nursing · Research Institute of Nursing Science, Jeonbuk National University
2) 전북대학교 간호대학간호과학연구소, 교수
3) Unit Manager, Asan Medical Center
3) 서울아산병원, 수간호사
4) Team Manager, Asan Medical Center
4) 서울아산병원, 팀장
Address reprint requests to: Nho, Ju-Hee College of Nursing · Research Institute of Nursing Science, Jeonbuk National University, 567, Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeonbuk-do, 54896, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-63-270-3108, Fax: +82-63-270-3127, E-mail: jhnho@jbnu.ac.kr
*This study was presented as a poster at the Spring Conference of The Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education in June 2025.*2025년 6월 한국간호교육학회 춘계 학술대회에서 포스터 발표되었음.
Received 2025 August 28; Revised 2025 October 20; Accepted 2025 October 22.

Abstract

Purpose:

Nurses are essential in pain management. Therefore, nursing students’ knowledge and attitudes toward pain are important, as they will care for patients experiencing various types of pain in clinical practice.

Methods:

This study used a cross-sectional survey to assess the knowledge and attitudes of nursing students in South Korea regarding pain. The online survey used the “Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP)” developed by Ferrell and McCaffery. Data were analyzed using χ2 tests, independent t-tests, and one-way ANOVA with Scheffé post-hoc test.

Results:

The knowledge and attitudes regarding pain among 126 nursing students averaged 20.40±4.06 points out of 41. Knowledge levels were classified as poor in 60 students (47.6%) and fair in 66 students (52.4%). The lowest correct response rates were observed in cancer-related pain (33.3%) and drug-related questions (47.6%). The pain education method was the only variable that significantly affected students’ knowledge and attitudes (F=7.70, p<.001). In this study 54.0% of students did not trust patients’ pain reports, and most participants did not implement appropriate pain interventions. Only 9.5% answered correctly regarding the respiratory suppression effects of opioid analgesics.

Conclusion:

Universities should recognize that students showed insufficient knowledge and attitudes regarding analgesics, pain assessment, and interventions. Reforming educational approaches in universities is essential to ensure that students are prepared to appropriate pain management in future clinical practice.

Keywords: 태도; 지식; 간호; 통증; 학생

Introduction

Pain is the most common reason for seeking medical attention, and pain management is a key aspect of nursing. For example, 88.0% of surgical patients report pain of above-moderate intensity [1,2]. Inadequate pain control can negatively affect patient’s physical and psychological health, as well as recovery progress and outcomes. Despite advances in medicine and technology, pain management remains insufficient. Insufficient knowledge and attitudes about pain among nurses have been identified as contributing factors [1,3]. Nurses are central to patient care and education in pain management; however, effective pain management is unlikely if nurses lack adequate knowledge and a positive attitude toward pain [3-5].

To improve pain management quality, nurses with appropriate knowledge must accurately assess patient’s pain and educate them on proper pain management [2,3,6]. Achieving this requires pain management education that connects nursing college curricula with clinical practice. Newly graduated nurses encounter patients experiencing pain of varying intensity and characteristics caused by diseases, procedures, and surgeries. Therefore, nursing students who will assess and manage patients’ pain should receive education and practical opportunities in pain management within the clinical curriculum [7]. Nurses who received pain management training often experienced a significant gap in clinical practice after graduation because of insufficient undergraduate education [4,8-10]. Over the past 20 years, numerous studies have assessed and evaluated the status and improvement of knowledge and attitudes regarding pain management among nursing students. These studies have shown that students’ lack of knowledge is a barrier to effective pain management [11,12].

Nursing students’ insufficient knowledge of medications and heightened concerns about opioid-related addiction and respiratory depression are major barriers to effective pain management [2,3,9,10,12]. This study examined the current status of nursing students in South Korea. The findings may inform the development of undergraduate nursing curricula and provide guidance for clinical educators to enhance nursing students’ and new nurses’ knowledge of pain management.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to suggest a method for improving the quality of pain nursing by assessing the level of knowledge and attitude toward pain of nursing college students in South Korea. The specific purpose is as follows.

  • • To assess nursing students’ knowledge and attitudes toward pain.

  • • To examine differences in knowledge and attitudes toward pain according to nursing students’ general characteristics.

  • • To identify nursing students’ educational needs regarding pain management.

Methods

Design

This study was a cross-sectional survey to assess the knowledge and attitude regarding pain of third- and fourth-year nursing students attending nursing colleges.

Participants

This study was conducted with third- and fourth-year nursing students enrolled in four nursing colleges in Jeonbuk State, South Korea, and the convenience sampling method was used. The total number of participants required for this study was G*Power 3.1.9.7 for independent-tests, which estimated a minimum number of 102 participants based on the one-tailed test, effect size .5 [10], significance level .05, and power .80. A total of 141 subjects were calculated considering the 20.0%~30.0% dropout rate, 15 who incorrectly marked the questionnaire response were eliminated, thus a total of 126 participants were included in the final analysis.

Research tool

An online survey was conducted using the “Knowledge and Attitude Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP)” tool developed by Ferrell and McCaffery [13]. It consists of a total of 41 questions (22 true/false items, 15 optional items, 2 case study items: 2 cases for each sub-area of each case), and the wrong answer is treated as 0 points and the correct answer as 1 point, meaning that the higher the score, the higher the knowledge and attitude score for pain. In this study, a total of 41 questions were categorized into four areas: pain assessment (9 items: 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 31, 32, 38a, 39a), cancer-related pain (5 items: 5, 23, 25, 28, 30), drugs (23 items: 6~11, 13~19, 21, 24, 26~27, 29, 34~35, 37, 38b, 39b), and addiction/abuse/physical dependence (4 items: 20, 22, 33, 36) [14]. In addition, the achievement level was confirmed by converting the total score into percentages and classifying them into three stages: poor (<50.0%), fair (50.0%~75.0%), and good (>75.0%) [14,15]. The questionnaire was translated into Korean by two bilingual experts, who were fluent in English and Korean, and pilot-tested with 35 nurses to confirm clarity and accuracy of meaning. The Cronbach’s α of .70 and test–retest reliability of .80 [15]. In this study, the KR-20 (Kuder–Richardson) value expressed as a dichotomy score of 0 incorrect answers and 1 correct answer was calculated, and the moderate reliability was confirmed as .52 [16].

To identify nursing students’ educational needs regarding pain, questionnaire items were developed based on previous studies [2-5,8-10]. The questionnaires consisted of 11 items in three domains: willingness to receive education, purposes for receiving education, and preferred educational topics. Participants first responded to the main items in a dichotomous (yes/no) format, followed by selecting applicable reasons from multiple-choice options provided as sub-items. The content validity index evaluated by experts was 1.

Data collection and analysis

Data collection was conducted through an online survey from June 29 to November 30, 2023, among those who voluntarily agreed to participate in this study. Analysis of the collected data was performed using IBM SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corp.). The significance level was less than .05 for a one-tailed test. Descriptive statistics, including percentages, means, and standard deviations, were used to describe the subject’s general characteristics, knowledge, and attitude score levels. The differences in knowledge and attitude according to the general characteristics of the subject were analyzed using an independent t-test, χ2 test, and one-way ANOVA, with the Scheffé test used for post-hoc analysis.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Asan Medical Center (IRB No. 2023-0049) and Jeonbuk National University (IRB No. JBNU 2023-02-001-001) in South Korea. Even though the information was provided through voluntary participation in the study, all collected data were encrypted and de-identified to protect the personal information of the participants.

Results

Achievement level of knowledge and attitude toward pain according to the general characteristics of nursing students

A total of 126 nursing students enrolled in four nursing universities participated in this study. The mean age of the participants was 22.94±2.78 years, with 61.1% being under the age of 23. The majority of participants were women (81.0%), and fourth-year students accounted for 59.5% of the total. Among the participants, 88.1% had experience with pain education, 82.5% had experience with pain assessment, 75.4% had experience with pain intervention, and 72.2% had received education on medications. The most common source of pain education was supplementary instruction within major undergraduate nursing courses, as reported by 88.3% of the participants (Table 1).

Achievement Level of Knowledge and Attitudes regarding Pain according to General Characteristics of Nursing Students

The total score for knowledge and attitudes regarding pain was 20.40±4.06 out of 41 points. The converted score was 48.0%. Knowledge and attitudes among nursing students differed based on the method of pain education. Post-hoc analysis revealed that students who received incidental education integrated into core subjects scored higher than those who received education from nurses (F=7.70, p<.001). There were no significant differences according to other general characteristics (Table 1).

When classifying the achievement level of knowledge and attitudes toward pain into three categories, 60 (47.6%) were classified as poor and 66 (52.4%) as fair. When examining whether there was a difference in achievement level according to the general characteristics of the participants, it was found that the group that received training incidentally through core subjects had a significantly higher level of achievement (χ2=12.58, p=.006) (Table 1).

Nursing students’ knowledge and attitudes regarding pain

When knowledge and attitudes regarding pain were classified into four areas (pain assessment, cancer pain, drugs, and addiction/abuse/physical dependence), the lowest correct answer rate (33.3%) was found in the domain of knowledge and attitudes toward cancer pain. The next lowest correct answer rates were identified in the domains of drugs (47.6%), pain assessment (57.9%), and addiction/abuse/physical dependence (61.9%).

The top five items with the highest incorrect response rates included: administration of opioid analgesics to a smiling patient who reports a pain score of 8 (Item No. 38b, 92.9%); the likelihood of clinically significant respiratory depression in patients receiving long-term opioid therapy for cancer pain (Item No. 28, 90.5%); the appropriate route of opioid administration for cancer pain management (Item No. 23, 87.3%); the probability of respiratory depression in patients receiving a stable, long-term opioid dose (Item No. 6, 84.9%); and administration of opioids to a patient who grimaces during movement and reports a pain score of 8 (Item No. 39b, 83.3%). High incorrect answer rates were also identified in item 3 of the drug domain and item 2 of the cancer pain domain. More than half of the participants (54.0%) did not trust patients’ reports of pain (Table 2).

Nursing Student’s Knowledge and Attitudes regarding Pain (N=126)

The educational needs for pain management among nursing students

The majority of nursing students (96.0%) stated that they needed intensive education on pain, and 85.7% of the participants reported that this was because they needed to connect this knowledge to future clinical practice. In addition, 76.2% of students requested an educational program about opioid analgesics, and 71.4% agreed that an educational program about non-opioid analgesics was needed. The demand for expert training was high, as 86.0% of participants indicated willingness to attend pain-related expert lectures (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Current status of nursing students’ needs for pain education

Discussion

This cross-sectional survey examined the knowledge and attitudes toward pain among nursing students. Nursing students, who will directly assess and manage patients experiencing pain, require adequate knowledge and appropriate attitudes [10]. In this study, the mean knowledge score was 20.40±4.06 out of 41 (converted score: 48.0%), and 47.6% of participants were classified as having poor knowledge, which was lower than in previous studies using the same tool [3,14,15,17,18]. These results should be interpreted within the context of South Korean nursing education, where students complete clinical practicums in their third and fourth years but their clinical exposure is limited by the curriculum’s predetermined clinical hours. More importantly, institutional and legal barriers prevent students from directly participating in key aspects of pain management, such as assessing patients’ pain, administering opioid or non-opioid analgesics, or providing patient education on additional interventions. Consequently, their practicum was largely limited to observing nurses’ activities, which may have made clinical training superficial. These systemic limitations in South Korean nursing education likely influenced students’ responses to survey items related to clinical practice.

Previous studies reported differences in knowledge and attitude scores based on participants’ the general characteristics [7,9,10,18,19]; however, in this study, the only significant difference was associated with the method of receiving education. Despite 88.1% of students indicating they had received pain education, the mean score remained very low. This finding suggests that university-provided education has not been delivered in a way that is directly applicable to clinical practice. Universities should therefore determine which aspects of current pain education programs—such as methods or content—are insufficient, and develop targeted improvements to better prepare students who will become new graduate nurses.

The most vulnerable areas in nursing students’ knowledge and attitudes were cancer pain (33.3%) and drugs (47.6%). Inadequate knowledge about drugs has been consistently reported in previous studies [2,3,10,15,20,21], this issue is also common among nurses [7,20,22]. Lack of drug knowledge can result in inaccurate interventions. The high incorrect response rates for questionnaire items 38b and 39b in this study indicate that insufficient knowledge of opioid analgesics leads to inadequate pain interventions, which may cause various adverse patient outcomes. Addressing these educational gaps is essential to ensure that nursing students are prepared to assess and manage pain effectively, thereby improving patient safety and clinical outcomes. Most students in this study demonstrated incorrect knowledge regarding the respiratory suppression associated with opioid analgesics. Although clinically significant respiratory depression occurs in fewer than 1.0% of patients who use opioid analgesics at appropriate doses over extended periods [23,24], 90.5% of participants disagreed with this fact. Excessive concern about addiction or respiratory suppression among medical personnel remains the primary barrier to effective pain control in patients requiring opioid analgesics [11,23], a finding also confirmed in this study. Excessive concerns about opioid analgesic side effects combined with insufficient knowledge, may cause nurses to hesitate to administer these medications, impeding effective pain management for patients. Universities should recognize that students’ lack of drug knowledge interferes with proper pain management and should shift toward practical education including types of drugs used in specific cases, administration methods, side effects, and strategies or managing adverse reactions. Students also demonstrated a high rate of incorrect answers regarding symptoms of physical dependence (77.8%). Nursing students’ misconceptions about opioid analgesics—such as addiction, physical dependence, tolerance, and respiratory depression—may be conveyed to patients, potentially resulting in inadequate pain management. Therefore, universities should provide education that ensures students acquire accurate knowledge and are well-prepared for clinical practice.

In addition to knowledge of drugs and pain interventions, the ability to assess both verbal and nonverbal patient communication and accurately evaluate pain is essential [10,11]. Pain assessment, the critical first step in pain management, showed a low correct response rate among participants in this study (57.9%). If a patient reports a pain score is 8, but shows no nonverbal signs and does not after receiving pain medication, the patient’s report should be taken seriously, and further interventions should be provided. However, 54.0% of nursing students in this study did not believe the patient’s reported pain, and 27.0% recorded pain scores below 3, which would not prompt additional intervention. Among patients who displayed painful expressions, 40.5% of students did not believe the pain reported by the patient. Although student confidence in patients’ pain reports was slightly higher than in previous studies [2,7,9], this level remains insufficient for effective pain management. When asked who could most accurately assess a patient’s pain, 60.0% of students identified a doctor or nurse. Accurate pain assessment is essential for appropriate pain interventions. Educators should provide nursing students with case examples representing various types of pain in diverse clinical settings and incorporate role-playing exercises that connect pain assessment with suitable interventions. This strategy enables reassessment of students’ knowledge correction of misconceptions and guidance toward appropriate clinical practice.

Eighty-six percent of participants reported wanting specialized pain education relevant to their nursing practice. Students perceived that current undergraduate pain education is insufficient for their clinical practice. They require accurate knowledge of pain assessment and intervention, particularly regarding medications such as opioid analgesics. However, significant challenges remain in addressing barriers within nursing colleges. Universities facing limited resources, may consider existing undergraduate pain education and clinical practicums adequate. Nevertheless, even in a tertiary hospital in South Korea believed to offer comprehensive pain management programs for new nurses, nurses’ knowledge and attitudes toward pain, especially opioid analgesics, remained very low [22].

E-learning, simulations, and their combination with classroom lectures are as effective as traditional face-to-face education [5,17]. These methods are particularly valuable for pain management education because they allow students to select appropriate interventions for patients reporting pain in a virtual, safe environment rather than in real clinical settings [17]. Actively inviting guest speakers specializing in pain management is also important to provide education on pathophysiology, pain assessment, interventions (including pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies), and common misconceptions about pain. However, current systemic constraints require significant changes. Even if nursing schools implement various educational strategies to improve students’ knowledge, these efforts may be ineffective if not integrated with clinical practice. Therefore, a direct clinical practicum system should be established to enable students to apply university-acquired knowledge in real clinical settings. Additionally, improvements in the licensing examination system—such as developing question types that promote critical thinking and clinical judgment—are necessary to support these educational initiatives.

The findings of this study illustrate how characteristics of South Korea’s clinical education system and sociocultural resistance to opioid analgesics may contribute to inadequate knowledge and attitudes regarding pain management. However, previous international studies have also identified nursing students’ knowledge deficits and suboptimal pain management, indicating that this issue requires broader international attention. Fundamental improvements in the quality of pain nursing should begin at the undergraduate level.

The study has several limitations. It used a convenience sample of third- and fourth-year nursing students from four nursing colleges in Jeonbuk State, South Korea introducing sampling bias and limiting generalizability to all nursing students nationwide. Although the questionnaire is widely used among nursing students globally, some items require knowledge beyond the students’ current educational level because the tool was originally developed for nurses. As a result, some students may have selected answers without knowing the correct responses.

This study is significant because it reveals the current level of knowledge and attitudes toward pain among nursing students in South Korea and identifies particularly vulnerable areas. Additionally, the study examined students’ educational needs regarding pain and suggested ways to address these needs.

Conclusion

The level of knowledge and attitudes toward pain among nursing students in South Korea was below average. Knowledge related to drugs and pain interventions was particularly inadequate, and pain assessment skills were also insufficient. Despite having prior educational experience in pain management, this did not significantly impact the scores, highlighting a disconnect between academic content and clinical practice. However, students who received pain education through undergraduate courses achieved better results than those educated by clinical nurses. Many students expressed the need for more intensive and clinically relevant education. Therefore, nursing schools should revise their pain education programs to better prepare students for effective pain management in clinical settings.

Notes

Author contributions

MR Kang: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JH Nho: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YJ Kwon: Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing. K Kim: Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

None

Acknowledgements

The authors used OpenAI’s ChatGPT to assist with English language editing and grammar refinement. The authors reviewed and verified all suggestions to ensure accuracy and integrity.

Supplementary materials

None

References

1. Gan TJ. Poorly controlled postoperative pain: Prevalence, consequences, and prevention. Journal of Pain Research 2017;10:2287–2298. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR. S144066.
2. Kusi Amponsah A, Kyei-Dompim J, Kyei EF, Oduro E, Afaya RA, Ahoto CK. Final year nursing students'knowledge and attitudes regarding children's pain. Pain Research &Management 2020 2020;:7283473. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7283473.
3. Hroch J, VanDenKerkhof EG, Sawhney M, Sears N, Gedcke-Kerr L. Knowledge and attitudes about pain management among Canadian nursing students. Pain Management Nursing 2019;20(4):382–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2018.12.005.
4. Byma EA, Wheeler H. The experience of new graduate registered nurses as managers of pain. Pain Management Nursing 2021;22(3):429–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2020.12.001.
5. Chow KM, Chan JC. Pain knowledge and attitudes of nursing students: A literature review. Nurse Education Today 2015;35(2):366–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.10.019.
6. Subramanian P, Ramasamy S, Ng KH, Chinna K, Rosli R. Pain experience and satisfaction with postoperative pain control among surgical patients. International Journal of Nursing Practice 2016;22(3):232–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12363.
7. Kusi Amponsah A, Oduro E, Bam V, Kyei-Dompim J, Ahoto CK, Axelin A. Nursing students and nurses'knowledge and attitudes regarding children's pain: A comparative cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2019;14(10):e0223730. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223730.
8. Campbell E. Faculty perspectives of teaching pain management to nursing students. Pain Management Nursing 2020;21(2):179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2019.07.010.
9. Lee EH, Lee HJ. Analysis of postoperative pain management knowledge and attitudes in nursing students for promotion of life care. Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association 2020;14(2):187–194. https://doi.org/10.21184/jkeia.2020.2.14.2.187.
10. Topal Hançer A, Yilmaz M. Determination of knowledge and attitudes related to pain of nursing students in Turkey. International Journal of Caring Sciences 2020;13(1):716–724.
11. Cousins M, Lane-Krebs K, Matthews J, Johnston-Devin C. Student nurses'pain knowledge and attitudes towards pain management over the last 20 years: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today 2022;108:105169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105169.
12. Latchman J. Improving pain management at the nursing education level: evaluating knowledge and attitudes. Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology 2014;5(1):10–16.
13. Ferrell B, McCaffery M. Knowledge and attitudes survey regarding pain [Internet. City of Hope 2014. [cited 2023 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.cityofhope.org/sites/www/files/2022-05/knowldege-attitude-survey-regarding-pain.pdf.
14. Nguyen AT, Dang AK, Nguyen HTT, Nguyen TX, Nguyen TN, Nguyen TTH, et al. Assessing knowledge and attitudes regarding pain management among nurses working in a geriatric hospital in Vietnam. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 2021;14:799–807. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S285044.
15. Shdaifat E, Al-Shdayfat N, Sudqi A. Saudi nursing students'pain management knowledge and attitudes. Nursing Open 2020;7(6):1833–1839. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.570.
16. Tan Ş. Misuses of KR-20 and Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients. Education and Science 2009;34(152):101–112.
17. Evans CB, Mixon DK. The evaluation of undergraduate nursing students'knowledge of post-op pain management after participation in simulation. Pain Management Nursing 2015;16(6):930–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2015.07.006.
18. Kim SR, Lee EM, Kim SH, Kim YO, Kim HJ, Park MS, et al. Knowledge and attitude for cancer pain management of nursing students. Stress 2010;18(4):337–344.
19. Fang LY, Xu YC, Lin DN, Jin JF, Yan M. Attitude and intention regarding pain management among Chinese nursing students: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Pain Management Nursing 2017;18(4):250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2017.01.001.
20. Ortiz MI, Ponce-Monter HA, Rangel-Flores E, Castro-Gamez B, Romero-Quezada LC, O'Brien JP, et al. Nurses'and nursing students'knowledge and attitudes regarding pediatric pain. Nursing Research and Practice 2015 2015;:210860. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/210860.
21. Yi KM, Koo HY. Nursing students'knowledge on children's pain. Journal of East-West Nursing Research 2010;16(2):113–121.
22. Kang MR, Kwon YJ. Nurses'knowledge and attitudes toward patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain control in a tertiary hospital in South Korea. BMC Nursing 2022;21(1):319. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01106-7.
23. Ferrell BR, McCaffery M. Nurses'knowledge about equianalgesia and opioid dosing. Cancer Nursing 1997;20(3):201–212. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-199706000-00006.
24. Vadivelu N, Urman RD, Hines RL. Essentials of pain management Springer; 2011;:91–104.

Article information Continued

Table 1

Achievement Level of Knowledge and Attitudes regarding Pain according to General Characteristics of Nursing Students

Variables Value Total t/F (p) Poor Fair χ2 (p)


n (%) or mean±SD Mean±SD n (%)
Total 126 (100.0) 20.40±4.06 60 (47.6) 66 (52.4)
Age (years) 22.94±2.78
 <23 77 (61.1) 20.34±3.84 -0.20 (.839) 38 (49.4) 39 (50.6) 0.23 (.715)
 ≥23 49 (38.9) 20.49±4.44 22 (44.9) 27 (55.1)
Gender
 Men 102 (81.0) 20.54±4.14 0.81 (.420) 46 (45.1) 56 (54.9) 1.36 (.264)
Women 24 (19.0) 19.79±3.77 14 (58.3) 10 (41.7)
Grade
 Junior 51 (40.5) 20.88±4.19 1.10 (.270) 23 (45.1) 28 (54.9) 0.21 (.717)
 Senior 75 (59.5) 20.07±3.97 37 (49.3) 38 (50.7)
Religion
 Yes 45 (35.7) 20.36±3.89 0.08 (.933) 22 (48.9) 23 (51.1) 0.04 (.854)
 None 81 (64.3) 20.42±4.18 38 (46.9) 43 (53.1)
Education experience of pain
 Yes 111 (88.1) 20.31±4.05 0.67 (.499) 52 (46.8) 59 (53.2) 0.22 (.784)
 No 15 (11.9) 21.07±4.25 8 (53.3) 7 (46.7)
Education experience of pain assessment
 Yes 104 (82.5) 20.67±3.78 -1.67 (.097) 46 (44.2) 58 (55.8) 2.74 (.107)
 No 22 (17.5) 19.09±5.11 14 (63.6) 8 (36.4)
Education experience of pain intervention
 Yes 95 (75.4) 20.63±4.03 -1.13 (.258) 41 (43.2) 54 (56.8) 3.08 (.099)
 No 31 (24.6) 19.68±4.16 19 (61.3) 12 (38.7)
Education experience of drug
 Yes 91 (72.2) 20.55±3.97 -0.67 (.499) 40 (44.0) 51 (56.0) 1.76 (.233)
 No 35 (27.8) 20.00±4.33 20 (57.1) 15 (42.9)
Route of education experience of pain*
 Incidentally to the main subjecta 98 (88.3) 21.01±3.67 7.70 (<.001) a>b 40 (40.8) 58 (59.2) 12.58 (.006)
 From the nurseb 4 (3.6) 14.75±4.35 4 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
 Self-learningc 3 (2.7) 15.67±4.51 3 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
 Independent educationd 6 (5.4) 16.50±4.23 5 (83.3) 1 (16.7)

SD=standard deviation

*

Analysis results of 111 subjects who had education experience

Table 2

Nursing Student’s Knowledge and Attitudes regarding Pain (N=126)

Item No. Contents Correct Incorrect

n (%) n (%)
Pain assessment 73 (57.9) 53 (42.1)
12 Children less than 11 years old cannot reliably report pain so clinicians should rely solely on the parent’s assessment of the child’s pain intensity. (F) 112 (88.9) 14 (11.1)
2 Because their nervous system is underdeveloped, children under two years of age have decreased pain sensitivity and limited memory of painful experiences. (F) 87 (69.0) 39 (31.0)
3 Patients who can be distracted from pain usually do not have severe pain. (F) 87 (69.0) 39 (31.0)
32 Which of the following describes the best approach for cultural considerations in caring for patients in pain: (c) 81 (64.3) 45 (35.7)
a. There are no longer cultural influences in the U.S. due to the diversity of population.
b. Cultural influences can be determined by an individual’s ethnicity.
c. Patients should be individually assessed to determine cultural influences.
d. Cultural influences can be determined by an individual’s socioeconomic status.
31 The most accurate judge of the intensity of the patient’s pain is (c) a. The treating physician b. The patient’s primary nurse c. The patient d. The pharmacist e. The patient’s spouse or family 77 (61.1) 49 (38.9)
39a Patient B: Robert is 25 years old and this is his first day following abdominal surgery. As you enter his room, he is lying quietly in bed and grimaces as he turns in bed. Your assessment reveals the following information: BP=120/80; HR=80; R=18; on a scale of 0 to 10 (0=no pain/discomfort, 10=worst pain/discomfort) he rates his pain as 8. A. On the patient’s record you must mark his pain on the scale below. Circle the number that represents your assessment of Robert’s pain: (8) 75 (59.5) 51 (40.5)
38a Patient A: Andrew is 25 years old and this is his first day following abdominal surgery. As you enter his room, he smiles at you and continues talking and joking with his visitor. Your assessment reveals the following information: BP=120/80; HR=80; R=18; on a scale of 0 to 10 (0=no pain/discomfort, 10=worst pain/discomfort) he rates his pain as 8. A. On the patient’s record you must mark his pain on the scale below. Circle the number that represents your assessment of Andrew’s pain. (8) 58 (46.0) 68 (54.0)
4 Patients may sleep in spite of severe pain. (T) 53 (42.1) 73 (57.9)
1 Vital signs are always reliable indicators of the intensity of a patient’s pain. (F) 30 (23.8) 96 (76.2)
Cancer related pain 42 (33.3) 84 (66.7)
25 Which of the following analgesic medications is considered the drug of choice for the treatment of prolonged moderate to severe pain for cancer patients? (b) 88 (69.8) 38 (30.2)
a. Codeine b. Morphine c. Meperidine d. Tramadol
5 Aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents are NOT effective analgesics for painful bone metastases. (F) 61 (48.4) 65 (51.6)
30 Which of the following is useful for treatment of cancer pain? (d) 33 (26.2) 93 (73.8)
a. Ibuprofen (Motrin) b. Hydromorphone (Dilaudid) c. Gabapentin (Neurontin) d. All of the above
23 The recommended route of administration of opioid analgesics for patients with persistent cancer-related pain is (d) 16 (12.7) 110 (87.3)
a. Intravenous b. Intramuscular c. Subcutaneous d. Oral e. Rectal
28 A patient with persistent cancer pain has been receiving daily opioid analgesics for 2 months. Yesterday the patient was receiving morphine 200 mg/hour intravenously. Today he has been receiving 250 mg/hour intravenously. The likelihood of the patient developing clinically significant respiratory depression in the absence of new comorbidity is (a) 12 (9.5) 114 (90.5)
a. Less than 1% b. 1%~10% c. 11%~20% d. 21%~40% e. >41%
Drug 60 (47.6) 66 (52.4)
10 Elderly patients cannot tolerate opioids for pain relief. (F) 105 (83.3) 21 (16.7)
14 After an initial dose of opioid analgesic is given, subsequent doses should be adjusted in accordance with the individual patient’s response. (T) 101 (80.2) 25 (19.8)
11 Patients should be encouraged to endure as much pain as possible before using an opioid. (F) 97 (77.0) 29 (23.0)
13 Patients’ spiritual beliefs may lead them to think pain and suffering are necessary. (T) 91 (72.2) 35 (27.8)
21 The term ‘equianalgesia’ means approximately equal analgesia and is used when referring to the doses of various analgesics that provide approximately the same amount of pain relief. (T) 89 (70.6) 37 (29.4)
7 Combining analgesics that work by different mechanisms (e.g., combining an NSAID with an opioid) may result in better pain control with fewer side effects than using a single analgesic agent. (T) 83 (65.9) 43 (34.1)
24 The recommended route administration of opioid analgesics for patients with brief, severe pain of sudden onset such as trauma or postoperative pain is 83 (65.9) 43 (34.1)
(a) a. Intravenous b. Intramuscular c. Subcutaneous d. Oral e. Rectal
29 The most likely reason a patient with pain would request increased doses of pain medication is (a) 74 (58.7) 52 (41.3)
a. The patient is experiencing increased pain. b. The patient is experiencing increased anxiety or depression.
c. The patient is requesting more staff attention. d. The patient’s requests are related to addiction.
27 Analgesics for postoperative pain should initially be given (a) 68 (54.0) 58 (46.0)
a. Around the clock on a fixed schedule b. Only when the patient asks for the medication c. Only when the nurse determines that the patient has moderate or greater discomfort
16 Vicodin (hydrocodone 5 mg+acetaminophen 300 mg) PO is approximately equal to 5~10 mg of morphine PO. (T) 66 (52.4) 60 (47.6)
9 Opioids should not be used in patients with a history of substance abuse. (F) 60 (47.6) 66 (52.4)
26 A 30 mg dose of oral morphine is approximately equivalent to: (b) 57 (45.2) 69 (54.8)
a. Morphine 5 mg IV b. Morphine 10 mg IV c. Morphine 30 mg IV d. Morphine 60 mg IV
19 Benzodiazepines are not effective pain relievers and are rarely recommended as part of an analgesic regiment. (T) 56 (44.4) 70 (55.6)
15 Giving patients sterile water by injection (placebo) is a useful test to determine if the pain is real. (F) 55 (43.7) 71 (56.3)
18 Anticonvulsant drugs such as gabapentin (Neurontin) produce optimal pain relief after a single dose. (F) 54 (42.9) 72 (57.1)
35 The time to peak effect for morphine given orally is (c) a. 5 minutes b. 30 minutes c. 1~2 hours d. 3 hours 53 (42.1) 73 (57.9)
34 The time to peak effect for morphine given IV is (a) a. 15 minutes b. 45 minutes c. 1 hour d. 2 hours 15 minutes 48 (38.1) 78 (61.9)
8 The usual duration of analgesia of 1~2 mg morphine IV is 4~5 hours. (F) 34 (27.0) 92 (73.0)
37 Which statement is true regarding opioid induced respiratory depression: (b) 34 (27.0) 92 (73.0)
a. More common several nights after surgery due to accumulation of opioid.
b. Obstructive sleep apnea is an important risk factor.
c. Occurs more frequently in those already on higher doses of opioids before surgery.
d. Can be easily assessed using intermittent pulse oximetry.
17 If the source of the patient’s pain is unknown, opioids should not be used during the pain evaluation period, as this could mask the ability to correctly diagnose the cause of pain. (F) 31 (24.6) 95 (75.4)
39b Patient B: Robert 21 (16.7) 105 (83.3)
B. Your assessment, above, is made two hours after he received morphine 2 mg IV. Half hourly pain ratings following the injection ranged from 6 to 8 and he had no clinically significant respiratory depression, sedation, or other untoward side effects. He has identified 2/10 as an acceptable level of pain relief. His physician’s order for analgesia is “morphine IV 1~3 mg q1h PRN pain relief.” Check the action you will take at this time: (4)
1. Administer no morphine at this time. 2. Administer morphine 1 mg IV now. 3. Administer morphine 2 mg IV now. 4. Administer morphine 3 mg IV now.
6 Respiratory depression rarely occurs in patients who have been receiving stable doses of opioids over a period of months. (T) 19 (15.1) 107 (84.9)
38b Patient A: Andrew 9 (7.1) 117 (92.9)
B. Your assessment, above, is made two hours after he received morphine 2 mg IV. Half hourly pain ratings following the injection ranged from 6 to 8 and he had no clinically significant respiratory depression, sedation, or other untoward side effects. He has identified 2/10 as an acceptable level of pain relief. His physician’s order for analgesia is “morphine IV 1~3 mg q1h PRN pain relief.” Check the action you will take at this time. (4)
1. Administer no morphine at this time. 2. Administer morphine 1 mg IV now. 3. Administer morphine 2 mg IV now. 4. Administer morphine 3 mg IV now.
Addiction/Abuse/Dependency 78 (61.9) 48 (38.1)
20 Narcotic/opioid addiction is defined as a chronic neurobiologic disease, characterized by behaviors that include one or more of the following: impaired control over drug use, compulsive use, continued use despite harm, and craving. (T) 112 (88.9) 14 (11.1)
22 Sedation assessment is recommended during opioid pain management because excessive sedation precedes opioid-induced respiratory depression. (T) 105 (83.3) 21 (16.7)
33 How likely is it that patients who develop pain already have an alcohol and/or drug abuse problem? (b) a. 1% b. 5%~15% c. 25%~50% d. 75%~100% 67 (53.2) 59 (46.8)
36 Following abrupt discontinuation of an opioid, physical dependence is manifested by the following: (a) 28 (22.2) 98 (77.8)
a. Sweating, yawning, diarrhea and agitation with patients when the opioid is abruptly discontinued.
b. Impaired control over drug use, compulsive use, and craving
c. The need for higher doses to achieve the same effect.
d. a and b

BP=blood pressure; F=false; HR=heart rate; IV=intravenous; NSAID=nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug; PO=by mouth; PRN=whenever necessary; q1h=every hour; R=respiratory rat; T=true

Figure 1

Current status of nursing students’ needs for pain education